Performance evaluation of the Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Specific Quantitative IgG test by comparison with the surrogate virus neutralizing antibody test and clinical assessment.

BACKGROUND: Despite the worldwide campaigns of COVID-19 vaccinations, the pandemic is still a major medical and social problem. The Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific quantitative IgG (VITROS S-IgG) assay has been developed to assess neutralizing antibody (NT antibody) against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antibodies. However, it has not been evaluated in Japan, where the total cases and death toll are lower than the rest of the world. METHODS: The clinical performance of VITROS S-IgG was evaluated by comparing with the NT antibody levels measured by the surrogate virus neutralizing antibody test (sVNT). A total of 332 serum samples from 188 individuals were used. Of these, 219 samples were from 75 COVID-19 patients: 96 samples from 20 severe/critical cases (Group S), and 123 samples from 55 mild/moderate cases (Group M). The remaining 113 samples were from 113 healthcare workers who had received 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. RESULTS: VITROS S-IgG showed good correlation with the cPass sVNT assay (Spearman rho = 0.91). Both VITROS S-IgG and cPass sVNT showed significantly higher plateau levels of antibodies in Group S compared to Group M. Regarding the humoral immune responses after BNT162b2 vaccination, individuals who were negative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N)-specific antibodies had statistically lower titers of both S-IgG and sVNT compared to individuals with a history of COVID-19 and individuals who were positive for N-specific antibodies without history of COVID-19. In individuals who were positive for N-specific antibodies, S-IgG and sVNT titers were similar to individuals with a history of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Although the automated quantitative immunoassay VITROS S-IgG showed a reasonable correlation with sVNT antibodies, there is some discrepancy between Vitros S-IgG and cPass sVNT in milder cases. Thus, VITROS S-IgG can be a useful diagnostic tool in assessing the immune responses to vaccination and herd immunity. However, careful analysis is necessary to interpret the results.

Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment.

Quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is highly expected to evaluate immune status, vaccine response, and antiviral therapy. The Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys® anti-S) was developed to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. We sought to investigate whether Elecsys® anti-S can be used to predict neutralizing activities in patients' serums using an authentic virus neutralization assay. One hundred forty-six serum samples were obtained from 59 patients with COVID-19 at multiple time points. Of the 59 patients, 44 cases were included in Group M (mild 23, moderate 21) and produced 84 samples (mild 35, moderate 49), while 15 cases were included in Group S (severe 11, critical 4) and produced 62 samples (severe 43, critical 19). The neutralization assay detected 73% positive cases, and Elecsys® anti-S and Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Elecsys® anti-N) showed 72% and 66% positive cases, respectively. A linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-S assay and the neutralization assay were highly correlated (r = 0.7253, r2 = 0.5261) than a linear correlation between the Elecsys® anti-N and neutralization assay (r = 0.5824, r2 = 0.3392). The levels of Elecsys® anti-S antibody and neutralizing activities were significantly higher in Group S than in Group M after 6 weeks from onset of symptoms (p < 0.05). Conversely, the levels of Elecsys® anti-N were comparable in both groups. Three immunosuppressed patients, including cancer patients, showed low levels of anti-S and anti-N antibodies and neutralizing activities throughout the measurement period, indicating the need for careful follow-up. Our data indicate that Elecsys® anti-S can predict the neutralization antibodies in COVID-19.

Activation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody is slower than elevation of spike-specific IgG, IgM, and nucleocapsid-specific IgG antibodies.

COVID-19 antibody testing has been developed to investigate humoral immune response in SARS-CoV-2 infection. To assess the serological dynamics and neutralizing potency following SARS-CoV-2 infection, we investigated the neutralizing (NT) antibody, anti-spike, and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies responses using a total of 168 samples obtained from 68 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Antibodies were measured using an authentic virus neutralization assay, the high-throughput laboratory measurements of the Abbott Alinity quantitative anti-spike receptor-binding domain IgG (S-IgG), semiquantitative anti-spike IgM (S-IgM), and anti-nucleocapsid IgG (N-IgG) assays. The quantitative measurement of S-IgG antibodies was well correlated with the neutralizing activity detected by the neutralization assay (r = 0.8943, p < 0.0001). However, the kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 NT antibody in severe cases were slower than that of anti-S and anti-N specific antibodies. These findings indicate a limitation of using the S-IgG antibody titer, detected by the chemiluminescent immunoassay, as a direct quantitative marker of neutralizing activity capacity. Antibody testing should be carefully interpreted when utilized as a marker for serological responses to facilitate diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic interventions.

Molecular characterization of SARS-CoV-2 detected in Tokyo, Japan during five waves: Identification of the amino acid substitutions associated with transmissibility and severity

Many variants of SARS-CoV-2 have emerged around the world. It is therefore important to understand its global viral evolution and the corresponding mutations associated with transmissibility and severity. In this study, we analyzed 112 whole genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 collected from patients at Juntendo University Hospital in Tokyo and the genome data from entire Japan deposited in Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID) to examine the relationship of amino acid changes with the transmissibility and the severity of each strain/lineage. We identified 12 lineages, including B.1.1.284, B.1.1.214, R.1, AY.29, and AY.29.1, which were prevalent specifically in Japan. B.1.1.284 was most frequently detected in the second wave, but B.1.1.214 became the predominant lineage in the third wave, indicating that B.1.1.214 has a higher transmissibility than B.1.1.284. The most prevalent lineage during the fourth and fifth wave was B.1.1.7 and AY.29, respectively. In regard to the severity of identified lineages, B.1.1.214 was significantly lower than the reference lineage, B.1.1.284. Analysis of the genome sequence and other traits of each lineage/strain revealed the mutations in S, N, and NSPs that increase the transmissibility and/or severity. These mutations include S: M153T, N: P151L, NSP3: S543P, NSP5: P108S, and NSP12: A423V in B.1.1.284;S: W152L and E484K in R.1;S: H69del, V70del, and N501Y in the Alpha strain;S: L452R, T478K, and P681R in the Delta strain. Furthermore, it is suggested that the transmissibility of B.1.1.214 could be enhanced by the mutations N: M234I, NSP14: P43L, and NSP16: R287I. To address the issue of the virus evolution, it is necessary to continuously monitor the genomes of SARS-CoV-2 and analyze the effects of mutations for developing vaccines and antiviral drugs effective against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Meals and Room Temperature Storage do not Significantly Affect Feasibility of Direct RT-PCR Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva.

BACKGROUND: Rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using saliva samples has emerged as a preferred technique since sample collection is easy and noninvasive. In addition, several commercial high-throughput PCR kits that do not require RNA extraction/purification have been developed and are now available for testing saliva samples. However, an optimal protocol for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing of saliva samples using the RNA extraction/purification-free kits has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to establish optimal preanalytical conditions, including saliva sample collection, storage, and dilution for RNA extraction/purification-free RT-PCR (direct RT-PCR). METHODS: Patients suspected with COVID-19 from March 02 to August 31, 2020, were enrolled in this study. A total of 248 samples, including 43 nasopharyngeal swabs and 205 saliva samples, were collected from 66 patients (37 outpatients and 29 inpatients) and tested using the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Detection Kit (nCoV-DK, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). RESULTS: The detection results obtained using nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples matched 100%. The sampling time, i.e., either awakening time or post-breakfast, had no significant effect on the viral load of the saliva samples. Although saliva samples are routinely diluted to reduce viscosity, we observed that dilution negatively affected PCR sensitivity. Saliva samples could be stored at room temperature (25°C) for 24 hours or at 4°C for up to 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the appropriate conditions of saliva sample collection, processing, and storage, and indicated that the nCoV-DK is applicable to saliva samples, making the diagnosis method simple and safe.

Antibody response and seroprevalence in healthcare workers after the BNT162b2 vaccination in a University Hospital at Tokyo.

In 2020, we reported a low seroprevalence of N-specific antibodies in 4147 health care workers (HCWs) at a frontline hospital in Tokyo, Japan. In Japan, a vaccine campaign was launched in early 2021. We re-evaluated seroprevalences of N- and S-specific antibodies in 2202 HCWs who took two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. In 2021, N-specific seroprevalence remains as low as 1.59%. The seroprevalences were comparable among all HCWs regardless of exposure levels. Almost all of the HCWs elicited S-specific antibodies after vaccination. However, the HCWs who had COVID-19 elicited higher S-specific antibody titers than those who did not have COVID-19. In the HCWs without a history of COVID-19, 1.1% (23 out of 2185) were seropositive with N-specific antibodies, indicating the existence of asymptomatic infections. Also, S-specific antibody titers were higher in females and younger HCWs, and in those who had severe side effects. However, S-specific antibody titers were lower depending on the number of days after the second dose of vaccination specifically in elderly individuals. In conclusion, this study indicates N-specific seroprevalence remains low in HCWs at a frontline hospital in Tokyo. The mRNA vaccine elicited S-specific antibody in HCWs, however, the titers decreased as the days proceeded.

Clinical Evaluation of Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibody assay and IgG assay using the Dimension EXL 200 in the Tokyo Metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of the Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibody assay (CV2T) and IgG assay (CV2G) that can detect antibodies against the receptor binding domain of S antigen in patients with COVID-19 in a Tokyo metropolitan area. METHODS: Sensitivity and antibody levels were examined by CV2T and CV2G on Dimension EXL 200 using 236 serum samples obtained from 79 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients at multiple time points and were compared with disease severity by the World Health Organization criteria. The assay specificity was evaluated using samples collected before the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The sensitivity of CV2T and CV2G were low (16.7-21.4%) in days 0-6 and increased to 43.8-52.5% in days 7-13 and to 80.8-90.0% in days 14-20. The seroprevalences persisted after day 21 to days past 42 regardless of disease severity. In every day grouping, mean antibody levels were higher in severe cases than in mild cases with a significant difference in days 14-20 and days 20-27. The specificity was 97.9 % (95% CI; 92.8-99.8) for CV2T and 99.0 % (95% CI; 94.6-100) for CV2G. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a high specificity and high sensitivity at 14 days of CV2T and CV2G as antibody detection assays.

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers at a frontline hospital in Tokyo.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are highly exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The actual coronavirus disease (COVID-19) situation, especially in regions that are less affected, has not yet been determined. This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs working in a frontline hospital in Tokyo, Japan. In this cross-sectional observational study, screening was performed on consented HCWs, including medical, nursing, and other workers, as part of a mandatory health checkup. The screening test results and clinical characteristics of the participants were recorded. The antibody seroprevalence rate among the 4147 participants screened between July 6 and August 21, 2020, was 0.34% (14/4147). There was no significant difference in the seroprevalence rate between frontline HCWs with a high exposure risk and HCWs working in other settings with a low exposure risk. Of those seropositive for SARS-CoV-2, 64% (9/14) were not aware of any symptoms and had not previously been diagnosed with COVID-19. In conclusion, this study provides insights into the extent of infection and immune status in HCWs in Japan, which has a relatively low prevalence of COVID-19. Our findings aid in formulating public health policies to control virus spread in regions with low-intensity COVID-19.

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Japanese COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies in symptomatic Japanese COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Serum samples (n = 114) from 34 COVID-19 patients with mild to critical clinical manifestations were examined. The presence and titers of IgG antibody for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were determined by a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) using Alinity i SARS-CoV-2 IgG and by an immunochromatographic (IC) IgM/IgG antibody assay using the Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Test. RESULTS: IgG was detected by the CMIA in 40%, 88%, and 100% of samples collected within 1 week, 1-2 weeks, and 2 weeks after symptom onset in severe and critical cases, and 0%, 38%, and 100% in mild/moderate cases, respectively. In severe and critical cases, the positive IgG detection rate with the IC assay was 60% within one week and 63% between one and two weeks. In mild/moderate cases, the positive IgG rate was 17% within one week and 63% between one and two weeks; IgM was positive in 80% and 75% of severe and critical cases, and 42% and 88% of mild/moderate cases, respectively. On the CMIA, no anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detected in COVID-19 outpatients with mild symptoms within 10 days from onset, whereas 50% of samples from severe inpatients were IgG-positive in the same period. The IC assay detected higher IgM positivity earlier from symptom onset in severe and critical cases than in mild/moderate cases. CONCLUSIONS: A serologic anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody analysis can complement PCR for diagnosing COVID-19 14 days after symptom onset.

Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests.

We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.